Have you ever run a maze backwards? It's a breeze. Looking at the choices from the angle of the
maze-builder makes it a thousand times easier.
The same can be said for film festivals.
If you're a filmmaker who has never worked for a festival, you probably
don't know which way to turn. I understand. I've been there. We all have in one way or another in
different aspects in life. It's nothing
to be ashamed of. In fact, if you didn't
have questions, this blog wouldn't exist.
One of the many decisions you have to make is whether to
submit to a festival early, to get the screeners while they're fresh, or later
to be more on their mind when it comes time to decision making.
For the most part, it doesn't make a difference to us… for
the most part. There are a couple of
things that do make a difference.
First, whether it's late or early, do NOT submit your film
before it's finished. I mean, completely
finished, including test screenings for a handful of other filmmakers for
honest notes, then re-edits, then professionally edited sound, music that
doesn't drag the film to a grinding halt, color-timing, everything!
Yes, we accept works-in-progress, but look at the maze
backwards. We don't know who you
are. We don't know if your idea of
"finished" matches ours, and we're spending month after month
watching movies that people tell us are complete. They aren't.
So we'll watch your work-in-progress.
If the story isn't good, or the acting is sub-par, then we're going to
pass no matter how much work you do on it.
But if you've done a good job with the script, and the cast is good,
then we're going to be interested.
Now put yourself in our shoes and run the maze. You have ten good movies, but can only screen
three of them (obviously, the numbers are made up). One is a work-in-progress. The others are equally good and
finished. Which do you pick?
Another "for the most part" is the very late
submission. Every year we have extremely
late films submitted. By "extremely
late" I mean on or after our late deadline. The ones that come in after are usually from
friends of the festival. "Hey, is
it too late to…?"
We take as many of these as we can, but they are a pain in
the behind. We have to watch them on
short notice during our busiest time of the year. Our first thought when screening these ultra-late
movies is, "why are these idiots paying so much money at the last
minute?" But, they did pay, so we
treat them almost exactly like any other submission.
I say "almost" because if you submit on or after
our late deadline, it's going take us a couple of days to get to screen your
movie. During that time, we're
programming the festival. Sure, final
decisions have not yet been made and technically you have the same chance as
any other movie, but we're only human.
We have a list of our favorites.
We've contacted those filmmakers to update their premiere status. We already have more movies that we like than
slots to fill. The ultra-late movie is
going to have to be head and shoulders better than anything we've seen in
nearly six months of watching submissions in order to bump a movie we already
like off the list. That's a big hill to
climb.
Having said that, for some odd reason, many of these late
submissions are really good. We have
programmed them before and will again – but it's not our favorite way to do
things and it does hurt your chances to try to come in under the wire. We have passed on perfectly good movies just
because they were so late that we didn't feel they were good enough to bump off
movies that submitted in a timely fashion.
So, those are the extremes.
Some people submit too early, before their movie is finished. Some too late, while we're in the middle of
making decisions. What about the average
movie? Is there a best time to submit a
movie that is completely done and ready for prime time?
No. We've programmed
movies that were the first to submit, the last, and everything in between. During the final selections we go through every
film – even the ones with passes from every screener – to make sure they have
had a fair shot, and that we haven't missed a diamond in the rough. Because, after all, those hard-to-find movies
are what DWF is all about.
We're open for submissions. If your film is ready, send it in.
1 comment:
The logistics performance index of Denmark is 3.78. It indicates a good performance - the logistics system is well prepared and organised, shipments mostly arrive on time and do not suffer damage, and the infrastructure is ready to handle even unpredictably big amounts of traffic as long as it is not overwhelming.
Post a Comment